Skip to main content

Bench marking for construction costs

QSs' involved with both pre-contract and post-contract may be aware of the process of bench-marking, in-case one is not, this may be of help depending on the quantum of work one is looking to bench-mark.

The process of bench-marking is essential, especially at the stage of preliminary cost estimates.

What I would do here is first try to establish a simple explanation to what cost bench-marking is, so that the process becomes clear.

Right, so the process of bench-marking involves a very basic elemental comparison of a particular type of project.

Please note my mention of a particular type of project here, since one cannot possibly establish a comparative between a residential and a commercial project, nor will one be able to establish a valid comparison between projects in various zones of construction, hence a similarity between the projects will have to be achieved either by the use of permutations or by simply comparing projects which would remain similar at the base.

The second word of importance is elemental, the importance of this remains for the fact the the cost per unit for the elemental area will be more accurate that the cost per unit of the overall project area, will explain this with a simple example:

Presuming that the year of construction is the same. We can establish a comparison between a 2B+G+37 storey to a B+G+20 storey, this is possible if we take up the process of elemental costing where in the cost per unit area is considered for the element alone i.e cost per unit area of the substructure including basements is taken on the basement area alone. Likewise the cost for the podium is considered for the podium area alone and the superstructure for the  super-built up area.
(I have still not gotten a hang of inserting tables into my blog so please excuse the monotony, will try to put in a link to some google sheets at the end so that you can access it.)

Additionally, taking cost for elemental area can help one compare projects that have similar elements but different outputs for example 3B+G+37 can be elementally compared for the substructure 3B+7P+25.

Appended is the link to a sample bench marking on Google sheets which could be used as reference.

Benchmarking - Example Sheet

Hope this article was useful.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RIBA WORK STAGES 2020

Right, so this is an 'on the go' post, since RIBA is becoming popular in 'hear and say' in India too, a few questions have been asked to me about the work stages that the RIBA Plan of Works 2020 has, to start here are a couple of links to the documents that you can use to check the original RIBA Plan of Works: Note: These are helpful, so please take your time to go through them, since this article/post is my interpretation on the RIBA. 1)  RIBA 2020 - Overview 2)  RIBA 2020 - Chart As such if you feel, you are not following a particular workflow process then you are in all probability using a combination of the APM (Association of Project Management) workflow and the AIA (American Institute of Architects) workflow with the inclusion of a Schematic Design Phase and a Tender Stage. Let's make it clear that there is no hard and fast rule, these workflow schemes just help with standardization and depending on the uniqueness of the projects the workflows will be altered ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reconciliation of Materials in a Construction Contract

Reconciliation is a very tricky topic to deal with. Most people will tell you that reconciliation is essential for a "free issue" or "client issue" contract. In my opinion reconciliation is very important for all types of construction contracts. The reason for my opinion is that I have had the good fortune to work with multiple types of contracts in the course of my career and invariably I find that it becomes essential to know what has/is going into your building and an effective method for a QS is by doing the material reconciliation, this certainly does not disregard the roles of the PM & the QA/QC Engineers, it is but a means of cross checking, as the close out figures will have actual consumption coefficients' that can be utilized to ascertain the connection with the initial design coefficients'. Also, reconciliation will always keep a check on the contractor and the wastage components. Coming to the process of material reconciliation: - Id...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introduction

This blog is dedicated to my teachers, professors, mentors and all the professionals I have been fortunate to be associated with, this is specially dedicated to the many who have told me that I need to take up teaching for the sheer fact that I love learning! So here you go.. Since  a large part of my experience is in the Indian market in particular Bangalore, the initial posts would be around this region. Even today I get approached by a few of my colleagues on the nitty-gritty of contracts that are being followed and also some basic questions involving Quantity Surveying that they find inaccessible on the web for some odd reason. So my posts are basically going to be in a Q & A format basis the many question I receive via email and WhatsApp. And as the description states these are things that I have experienced during my small career and would love for you as a reader to give me feedback which could help the many people reading this....
Post a Comment
Read more